“Republicans protest bipartisan makeup of Cherokee County elections board”

AJC:

publicans are urging local officials to create a GOP majority on the Cherokee County Board of Elections, which traditionally has been bipartisan.

The conflict is the latest backlash in a majority-Republican metro Atlanta county where Democratic voters have been increasing in recent years. Commissioners will vote Tuesday on two key elections board appointments that could swing the balance of the board.

Share this:

“DOJ claims releasing audio of Biden’s special counsel interview could lead to deepfakes”

AP:

Releasing an audio recording of a special counsel’s interview with President Joe Biden could spur deepfakes and disinformation that trick Americans, the Justice Department said, conceding the U.S. government could not stop the misuse of artificial intelligence ahead of this year’s election.

A senior Justice Department official raised the concerns in a court filing on Friday that sought to justify keeping the recording under wraps. The Biden administration is seeking to convince a judge to prevent the release of the recording of the president’s interview, which focused on his handling of classified documents.

Share this:

CNN admits it’s using different debate criteria for Biden, Trump than Kennedy

Joe Biden and Donald Trump are two of the least popular presidential candidates of all time. It’s no surprise that an independent presidential candidate (with a famous last name) is getting outsized attention among prospective voters. But there appears to be a strong effort to box Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. from the debate stage.

As I highlighted last month right when CNN made its announcement, CNN’s “objective” criteria (the term used in federal law) to stage a debate included the requirement that “a candidate’s name must appear on a sufficient number of state ballots to reach the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidency prior to the eligibility deadline.” As I noted, that would exclude both Biden and Trump, as neither is the party’s nominee nor has any paperwork been filed on behalf of either candidate in any state.

Recent coverage wondering if Kennedy might make the debate stage occasionally highlights this disparity, as Kennedy’s ballot access remains fairly successful but far from certain. A New York Times piece today notes (with a somewhat playful headline, “The Big Hurdle Between R.F.K. Jr. and the Debate Stage (It’s Not a Poll)”):

The Kennedy campaign has complained that the ballot access requirement to participate had set an unfair double standard for Mr. Kennedy, asserting that neither Mr. Biden nor Mr. Trump would qualify under those rules because they have not been officially nominated by their respective parties. Amaryllis Fox, Mr. Kennedy’s campaign manager, has said that “the 270 threshold is nonsensical.”

In a statement, CNN rejected that framing, saying that “as the presumptive nominees of their parties both Biden and Trump will satisfy” the ballot access requirement, adding that “as an independent candidate, under applicable laws R.F.K. Jr. does not.”

From another statement by CNN:

The law in virtually every state provides that the nominee of a state-recognized political party will be allowed ballot access without petitioning,” a CNN spokesperson said in a statement Wednesday. “As the presumptive nominees of their parties both Biden and Trump will satisfy this requirement. As an independent candidate, under applicable laws RFK Jr. does not. The mere application for ballot access does not guarantee that he will appear on the ballot in any state.”

This is an overt acknowledgement from CNN that it is not following its promulgated “objective” criteria. Instead, for Biden and Trump, it is altering the criteria, to allow a “presumptive nominee” (not a candidate), and to say that if these individuals “will satisfy” the requirement they qualify (not a present qualification). It’s a reason (as my earlier post points out) why the Commission on Presidential Debates scheduled its debates when it did and set the criteria as it did.

Kennedy has filed an FEC complaint to this effect. But it remains to be seen how the FEC will respond.

(It’s worth noting there is a polling requirement that Kennedy must separately meet. He has met 3 of the 4 polling requirements and might be able to meet the last one in the next several days.)

It’s no surprise that the major party candidates do not want to share the stage with a third candidate. Jimmy Carter didn’t want John Anderson on stage. After Ross Perot appeared on the debate stage in 1992, the CPD raised the polling threshold to appear from 5% to 15%. Biden and Trump would be happy to debate one another without Kennedy, I’m sure. And there are criteria that could have been designed to increase the likelihood of that happening, without this sort of error of making a standard that the staging network has to modify for two of the candidates.

Share this:

“Wisconsin AG Josh Kaul charges former Trump associates in fake elector scheme”

Molly Beck for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:

Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul has filed felony forgery charges against an aide and two attorneys who worked for former President Donald Trump in 2020 for their part in designing and executing a plan to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election by submitting false slates of electors for Trump.

The charges are filed in Dane County Circuit Court against Kenneth Chesebro, a Wisconsin native and lead architect of the 2020 fake elector plan; former Dane County Judge Jim Troupis, who represented Trump in Wisconsin during the 2020 election; and Mike Roman, a former Trump aide who allegedly delivered Wisconsin’s slate of false elector paperwork to a Pennsylvania congressman’s staffer in order to get them to Vice President Mike Pence on Jan. 6, 2021….

Share this:

“Intelligence chairman says US may be less prepared for election threats than it was four years ago”

AP:

With only five months before voters head to the polls, the U.S. may be more vulnerable to foreign disinformation aimed at influencing voters and undermining democracy than it was before the 2020 election, the leader of the Senate Intelligence Committee said Monday.

Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, based his warning on several factors: improved disinformation tactics by Russia and China, the rise of domestic candidates and groups who are themselves willing to spread disinformation, and the arrival of artificial intelligence programs that allow the rapid creation of images, audio and video difficult to tell from the real thing.

In addition, tech companies have rolled back their efforts to protect users from misinformation even as the government’s own attempts to combat the problem have become mired in debates about surveillance and censorship….

Several new challenges, however, will make safeguarding the 2024 election different than past cycles.

AI programs have already been used to generate misleading content, such as a robocall that mimicked the voice of Biden telling New Hampshire voters not to cast a ballot in that state’s primary. Deceptive deepfakes created with AI programs have also popped up ahead of elections in IndiaMexicoMoldova, Slovakia and Bangladesh.

Attempts by federal agencies to communicate with tech companies about disinformation campaigns have been complicated by court cases and debates over the role of government in monitoring political discourse.

Tech platforms have largely moved away from aggressive policies prohibiting election misinformation. X, formerly Twitter, laid off most of its content moderators in favor of a hands-off approach that now allows Neo-Nazi hate speech, Russian propaganda and disinformation.

Share this:

“How a Drop in Small-Dollar Donations Is Shaking Up Both Parties”

NOTUS:

In a stark reversal from recent political history, both parties have seen a significant decline this election cycle in the small-dollar contributions they harvest via text and email, largely from rank-and-file voters of modest means. Gone are the days when any candidate could expect to rake in small donations, according to Republican and Democratic digital strategists. Instead, only the smartest campaigns — and the perennial guests on Fox News — see the type of cash influx that was routine five years ago.

“We have squeezed every last penny in a period of time when the pennies are harder to come by,” said John Hall, a GOP digital strategist.

For Republicans, the downturn started in the 2022 midterm election. But Democrats say they are also seeing small donations decrease this election cycle across a range of candidates and liberal organizations.

Share this: